Catch&Score Finisher, Stretch Big, Tall Passer, Undersized Big

Robert Williams III Scouting Report


Robert Williams III surprised many with his decision to return for a sophomore season at Texas A&M. After 10 double-doubles in 31 games and a 25.3 PER in 801 minutes as a freshman, the six-foot-eight big man was projected to go in the lottery last June. He is the exact sort of athlete who often wows teams during the organized workout part of the pre-draft process and whose stock rises once there are no more games to evaluate.

But the 19-year-old[1] might have made a good decision coming back for a second year of college. ESPN’s Jonathan Givony ranked him seventh in his latest mock draft last week and Mike Schmitz has mentioned before he believes Williams has a real shot to be in play for the number one pick depending on how much improvement he shows this upcoming season.

Williams is a very appealing prospect because he might be the unicorn teams are looking for to place at center these days; someone who can space the floor out to the three-point line on offense and protect the rim on defense. He will be considered undersized to play that position full time by some due to his height but Williams has a seven-foot-four wingspan[2] and is listed at 237 pounds, measurables that suggest he could be able to play up to standard.

He’s, of course, not that player yet. Despite that weight, Williams hasn’t developed the strength and toughness needed for coaches to feel comfortable having him matchup against centers with prototypical size on an every-possession basis, aside from the fact that his jump-shot and general skill level are mostly theoretical at this point of his development.

[1] Who turns 20 in October

[2] According to Draft Express

(Check the rest of the post at RealGM)

3D wing, Shot Creator, Stretch Big, Tall Passer, Undersized Big

Abu Kigab Scouting Report


RJ Barrett was the headliner but Abu Kigab was perhaps just as vital for Canada to win the 2017 World Championships U19 in Cairo, Egypt a couple of weeks ago. Like his star teammate, the 18-year-old[1] also earned first team all-tournament honors after averaging 20.9 points per 40 minutes on 23.1% usage-rate and ranking fifth in the tournament in defensive rating — according to RealGM.

The Oregon-commit is one of the smoothest athletes ever but impressed the most with the versatility of his skill-set on offense. He can run pick-and-roll, pass on the move, make some pull-ups, get to the foul line and space the floor operating off the ball, projecting as the prototype perimeter player for this era of basketball.

Canada went small quite a bit and spaced the floor well to provide him the best possible environment to succeed. If Oregon does the same, I suspect he’ll be just as prominent as Dillon Brooks was there.

On the other end, the six-foot-seven combo forward possesses the combination of physical profile and athletic ability to develop into an impact defender who offers as much flexibility as he does on offense. But as of now he’s only OK, executing Canada’s zone scheme pretty well and doing a reasonable job in one-on-one defense but failing to create many events.


Kigab ranked third on the team in usage but with Lindell Wigginton missing a couple of games due to injury, he was given quite a bit of shot creation responsibility against a set defense and impressed with his fluidity operating off the dribble.

Kigab flashed the ability to make a well-timed pocket pass turning the corner but what he really likes to do in pick-and-roll is not attack right away. Regardless of whether the opponent shows hard, hedges or drops, Kigab prefers slowing down the pace, backing down a step or two, transition into an isolation and then turn on the jets.

He’s shown a strong preference for going left and has a combination of hesitation move + explosive first step to just blow by his man but has also shown quite a bit of craft to get around quicker types. Kigab can go between the legs on the move, pivot into a well-coordinated spin move in a pinch and showed an in-and-out dribble as well to shake his defender side-to-side.

He’s proven himself pretty fast for someone his size with the ball and consistently gets deep dribble penetration against his age group. But Kigab lacks the strength to maintain his balance through contact to get to the basket and often got up to finish in awkward balance.

He’s proven himself fearless weaving through traffic on his way to the goal (resulting in 7.3 foul shots per 40 minutes) and flashed an euro-step to score around rim protection in transition but for the most part struggled with his touch on non-dunk finishes in the half-court — converting his 56 two-point shots at a disappointing 42.9% clip.

As was the case, Kigab took quite a bit of stop-and-pop jumpers from the elbow area and his one-dribble pull-up looks pretty good. The above average efficiency isn’t there yet but he appears to have a great base to be build upon; able to stop on a dime, elevate in great balance, pull the trigger quickly and get his shot off comfortably.

But Kigab’s most productive contribution off the bounce is his passing on the move. He has a nice handle for someone his size, turning it over on just 10.6% of his possessions, and proved himself very willing to hit open teammates with kick-outs to the strong-side and drop-offs to a big man at the dunker’s spot when the defense collapsed against his dribble penetration — assisting on 14.9% of Canada’s scores when he was on the floor at the Worlds U19.


Kigab proved himself an effective, if not particularly great yet, option operating off the ball as a floor-spacer. He catches on the hop on spot-ups, gets off the ground quickly, shows to have fluid mechanics to be build upon and has a quick release — nailing 36.7% of his 30 three-point attempts in Cairo.

Canada used him as the screener on the pick-and-pop once or twice and Kigab flashed the ability to relocate to a spot beyond the arc, catch and rise up quickly in rhythm with great balance. But other than that, he was not given many opportunities to showcase the versatility of his shot, as he was not asked to sprint around staggered screens or come off pindown screens.


Kigab posted the best defensive rating on the team, despite the fact he had just five steals and three blocks in his 190 minutes in Cairo — marks that were disappointing given his six-foot-nine wingspan[2], his leaping ability and the fact he often put himself in good position as he proved himself attentive to his help-defense responsibilities.

That was the case because Kigab showed pretty good discipline putting in the effort to stay in front of similarly-sized players in individual defense, running shooters off their shots with his closeouts on weak-side defense and executing the rotations within the zone scheme Canada played towards the latter part of the tournament.

He didn’t show a lot of toughness containing dribble penetration and holding ground in the post, despite his 214-pound frame, but contested shots in a satisfying manner with his eight-foot-six standing reach, aside from the fact he was vital for Canada’s smaller lineups to work with his ability to help protect the defensive glass — collecting 23.3% of opponents’ misses when he was on the floor.

[1] Who turns 19 in November

[2] According to Draft Express

Editor’s Note: Rafael Uehara is the managing editor of ‘Basketball Scouting’. More of his work can be found here or at RealGM, where he is a regular contributor. He can be followed on twitter as @rafael_uehara

Post Scorer, Undersized Big

John Collins Scouting Report


John Collins was not perceived as a draft prospect at the start of last season. His first appearance on a mock draft at Draft Express was in January and he was slotted 35th. Six months later, he’s now ranked 12th on the website’s top 100 and projected to be drafted in the lottery tomorrow night.

The six-foot-nine big man shot up the boards in the last half-a-year after leading the NCAA in PER and guiding Wake Forest to an NCAA Tournament berth, averaging 1.68 points per shot and leading a team in offensive rating that ranked seventh in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency.

His measurements are unimpressive for a big man prospect and he played a back to the basket style that is unlikely to translate to the pros. His awareness on defense is also a serious concern for someone who will almost surely be viewed as a center in today’s game, given he’s yet to develop perimeter skills.

But Collins is an impressive athlete and posted a really strong statistical profile last season – averaging 28.8 points per 40 minutes on 30.4% usage while being responsible for creating most of his own shots, as 51.5% of his field goals were unassisted. He did so while playing the entire season at age 19, given his September birthday, despite being a sophomore.

(Check the rest of the post at RealGM)

Undersized Big

Noah Dickerson Scouting Report

Noah Dickerson seemed at Montverde like he could develop into an interesting player; a potential stretch five with enough mobility to guard pick-and-rolls above the foul line regularly and protect the rim by leveraging his size, if not necessarily as a constant threat to block shots.

But this has not materialized in his time at Washington.

Dickerson has taken just five three-point shots in his 51 appearances in college and isn’t used to help facilitate offense from the elbows, despite the fact he’s flashed some semblance of ball skills that could be of use on dribble hand-offs.

Dickerson doesn’t have enough explosiveness elevating off two feet to play above the rim as a target for lobs but could do well enough as a finisher out of pick-and-roll because he’s a good screener who looks to draw contact, has nice touch around the basket and can finish through contact. But he’s spent most of his minutes this season with another big in the lineup, so there’s often not enough space for him to roll hard to the basket.

Dickerson’s post game hasn’t improved much either. Often matched up against power forwards, the 245-pounder can get a deep seal below the foul line and rely on power moves to bully his way into short attempts near the basket or draw fouls – averaging 7.1 foul shots per 40 minutes so far this season, according to basketball-reference.

His footwork can also look fluid at times but for the most part he’s quite robotic with his moves and hasn’t shown anything in terms of a turnaround jumper or passing out of the low post – assisting on just 6% of Washington’s scores when he’s been on the floor.

Dickerson is just fourth on the team in usage rate, finishing only a fifth of the team’s possessions when he is in the game. When he’s not screening for the ball-handler, Dickerson mostly spots up on the baseline and waits for drop-offs. As mentioned above, he doesn’t have a lot of vertical explosion to go up strong in a pinch but can finish through contact – converting his 66 shots at the basket at a 66.7% clip, according to hoop-math.

Positioned close the rim, Dickerson can also make an impact on the offensive glass. He could play with a higher motor to be more of a difference maker but can consistently set inside position against college power forwards and has a seven-foot-one wingspan to rebound outside of his area – collecting 11.2% of Washington’s misses when he’s been on the floor. Dickerson doesn’t have much of a second jump to go back immediately, though, transforming just 62.5% of his second chances into putbacks.

Defensively, Dickerson doesn’t always get low to defend the pick-and-roll in a stance but still has appealing mobility for a big man – able to extend his coverage beyond the foul line and wall off dribble penetration, though he still hasn’t developed enough quickness to pick up smaller players on switches regularly.

Dickerson makes his rotations from time to time but is not consistent enough making himself a presence to crowd the area near the basket regularly, can’t act as a credible shot blocking threat and is foul prone – as he’s averaged 4.5 personal fouls per 40 minutes.

His biggest impact comes on the glass, where he is attentive to his boxout responsibilities and shows good instincts tracking the ball off the rim, collecting 24.1% of opponents’ misses when he’s been on the floor.

Editor’s Note: Rafael Uehara is the managing editor of ‘Basketball Scouting’. More of his work can be found here or at RealGM, where he is a regular contributor. He can be followed on twitter as @rafael_uehara

Catch&Score Finisher, Undersized Big

Cheick Diallo Scouting Report

(First posted at RealGM)

Diallo is similar to European prospects in the sense that he’s declaring for the draft without much recent evidence available of his talents, as he logged an almost impossible to believe 202 (TWO HUNDRED AND TWO) minutes last season. He was suspended for the first couple of months due to an NCAA investigation and never proved to have the sort of skill-level that fits Bill Self’s preferences, which makes it absurd Self recruited him in the first place.

Diallo lacks strength to establish deep position and bully opposing big men in the post, doesn’t have the combination of footwork and touch to get any good looks when he did get the ball with his back the basket, has no jumper to do anything with the ball from the mid-range and has never shown any passing instincts.

Defensively, he hurts the team with his inability to defend the post (which is a bigger problem in college) and can have a hard time boxing out true centers, as he’s only six-foot-nine and 218 pounds. Diallo is also extremely undeveloped from a team defense perspective (lost against the pick-and-roll) and showed poor extremely instincts in situations where he needed to think quickly, often making himself vulnerable to fouling, resulting in an average of 7.5 personal fouls per 40 minutes last season.

The reason why Diallo is going to end up a first round pick anyway is his athletic ability, which really is impressive.

He has nice hands to catch the ball on the move and can explode off the ground in a pinch to play above the rim as a target for lobs in transition, in the dunker spot and out of the pick-and-roll. Diallo can also make an impact an impact in the offensive glass, where his seven-foot-four wingspan helps him rebound outside of his area – collecting 10% of Kansas’ misses when he was on the floor.

Defensively, while Diallo struggled with the timing of his rotations, when he made them right, he proved himself an excellent rim protector, able to cover a lot of ground in a pinch and not only block shots in volume elevating out of one foot but also out of two feet defending on the ball – averaging 4.6 denials per 40 minutes.

As mentioned above, Diallo struggled boxing out behemoths, but he still managed to produce on the defensive glass, utilizing his athleticism to pursuit the ball off the rim relentlessly – grabbing 27% of opponents’ misses when he was in the game.

That prolificacy chasing after the ball is, perhaps, a bigger deal than his inability to hold ground below the glass because Diallo should be relied to pick up smaller players on switches quite a bit in his early days as a pro – unless he develops some team defense instincts at an unprecedented rate. And he is expected to be up for the task, as he can bend his knees to get low in a stance and possesses the sort of agility to keep pace with not just wings but also guards.

Editor’s Note: Rafael Uehara is the managing editor of ‘Basketball Scouting’. More of his work can be found here or at RealGM, where he is a regular contributor. He can be followed on twitter as @rafael_uehara

Post Scorer, Stretch Big, Undersized Big

Ben Bentil Scouting Report

If Ben Bentil was two inches taller, I’m fairly certain he could declare for the NBA draft right now and he’d be picked somewhere in the second round.

That’s the case because Bentil is developing into the sort of multi-dimensional scorer the league is looking for in its centers these days.

He is not a particularly good jump-shooter yet, converting just 26.6% of his 64 attempts from three-point range and 38.5% of his 96 mid-range shots this season – according to hoop-math. His 81.6% foul shooting suggests he could develop into a more capable outside shooter in time, but that time is not now.

Nevertheless, Bentil has proven himself enough of a threat from the perimeter that he must be accounted for stepping outside, not just spotting up on the weak-side but also catch-and-shooting out of the pick-and-pop. He has then offered Kris Dunn plenty of space to attack the lane off the bounce.

Most of his production originates in the interior, though. Bentil has lower-body strength in his 230-pound frame to get a deep seal, fluid (if not necessarily fully polished) footwork with his back to the basket and pretty good touch on turnaround hooks over this left shoulder and on face-up jumpers from the baseline. Opponents don’t have the option of switching a smaller player onto him.

He has not proven able to play above the rim as a constant target for lobs but has shown nice touch on non-dunk finishes around length, converting 65% of his 123 shots at the rim this season.

Bentil has an appealing offensive skill-set for a center but he is also six-foot-eight, which is why it’s tough to project him as an NBA prospect right now. His physical profile is similar to Paul Millsap’s but he is not the sort of dominant rebounder Millsap was when he first got his foot on the door.

Bentil is collecting just 13.5% of available misses, including just 16.8% of opponents’ misses – per basketball-reference, which is disappointing when you consider he is the only true big on Providence’s rotation.

Part of this is that Dunn is a great rebounder for a point guard and profits of Bentil doing the dirty work boxing out opponents, but he has nonetheless not shown he can be a dominant rebounder so far. Providence has played three NBA-caliber frontlines this season and Bentil was so-so in these matchups. He did well against Michigan State, OK against Marquette and poorly against Arizona.

Bentil has enough athletic ability to rotate off the weak-side and pick up some blocks coming from behind but he has not shown to be the sort of rim protector an NBA team would feel comfortable relying on to anchor its defense for consistent stretches. Providence has not asked of him to pick up smaller players on switches, so I can’t tell if he could potentially be an asset in that role.

Bentil simply lacks enough size or superior athleticism to project as even a zero defender at best as a center in the NBA. So, he will have to move down a position and play “power-forward” (whatever that means these days) but he doesn’t yet possess a polished enough perimeter-oriented skill-set to play that position in the new four-out Era.

Bentil isn’t a good enough shooter to space the floor consistently, doesn’t have much of a floor game to take more athletic players off the bounce and hasn’t shown many passing instincts facilitating offense from the elbows or making plays for others out of the short roll.

He is, however, someone worth keeping track of over the next couple of seasons.

Editor’s Note: Rafael Uehara is the managing editor of ‘Basketball Scouting’. More of his work can be found here or at Upside & Motor, where he is a regular contributor. He can be followed on twitter as @rafael_uehara

Catch&Score Finisher, Undersized Big

Marcus Lee Scouting Report


Marcus Lee has finally become a real rotation player in his third year at Kentucky and pretty much confirmed what he was thought of to be as a player this whole time.

Lee has been productive enough this season that if he were to miss games, his absence would be felt. But he is no impact player, even at the college level, and projects as a specialist in pros – a pick-and-roll diver and switch defender who needs to be put in the right context to bring something to the table.


What’s appealing about Lee is his athletic ability. He combines a six-foot-nine, 224-pound frame with coordination and agility moving space.

That’s best maximized on offense when he runs the floor in transition and when he gets the opportunity to dive down the lane to finish plays at the rim with explosiveness and crash the offensive glass in the half-court.

Lee would be perfect for a spread pick-and-roll attack. He is a poor screener at this point – rarely drawing contact and possessing a thin frame in the context of his height that does not make it tough for on-ball defenders to navigate around. But he can cut to the basket in a pinch and has proven able to play above the rim as a target for lobs. Even though he lacks touch on non-dunk finishes, Lee has converted 77% of his 61 shots at the rim – according to hoop-math.

Kentucky does not run that sort of fluid offense, though, so most of Lee’s impact is felt when he creates second chances and converts those into putbacks, doing so in 18 of his 44 offensive rebounds so far this season. He plays with good energy tracking the ball off the rim and possesses a seven-foot-three wingspan to help him outside of his area – collecting 16.1% of Kentucky’s misses when he’s been on the floor, according to basketball-reference.

Defensively, Lee has excelled when required to contain dribble penetration in space. He’s shown able to hedge and recover smoothly high in the perimeter and cut off drives to the basket when Kentucky’s guards can’t keep the opponent from getting the middle. He has length to contest mid-range shots effectively and even flashed the ability to pick up smaller players on switches – impressively keeping pace with Brandon Ingram for an iso in the game against Duke.

Lee’s mobility also makes him an asset to play above the rim as a shot blocker, as he can rotate to the front of the rim coming off the weak-side and elevate off the ground in a pinch. He’s only so-so reading when his help is essential and often sells out for the block, leaving his man in prime position to collect a potential offensive rebound. Lee has, nonetheless, blocked 26 shots in his 14 appearances and Kentucky is allowing just 93.7 points per 100 possessions with him in the lineup – the best defensive rating on the team.

Being a slimmer, more mobile big helps Lee in space but has hurt his ability to hold his ground in the defensive glass and in the post, though. He is already inattentive to his boxout responsibilities by nature but even when engaged, a mammoth like Marshall Plumlee can push him off his spot below the rim. Tony Parker, another mountain, also exposed how vulnerable Lee is trying to hold his ground in the low block.


Lee has not developed much skill to this point.

He lacks strength to set deep position in the post and even when he does manage to get the ball with his back to the basket, Lee rarely does anything of substance with it.

Kentucky also never really puts him in a position to flash his jump-shot – neither spotting up on the weak-side nor working out of the pick-and-pop, or show whether he can be an asset passing out of the short roll or help facilitate offensive from the elbows.

Lee has missed 14 of his 19 two-point jump-shots this season. He’s recorded just 18 assists in his 78 appearances at Kentucky and his 13.6% turnover rate is sky-high in the context of his 16.9% usage rate.

Lee has flashed a so-so handle to take opposing centers off the bounce in emergency situations and can go from the top of the key to the rim in just a couple dribbles thanks to his long strides but lacks touch on non-dunk finishes.

Editor’s Note: Rafael Uehara is the managing editor of ‘Basketball Scouting’. More of his work can be found here or at Upside & Motor, where he is a regular contributor. He can be followed on twitter as @rafael_uehara